Comments on: A relatively serious proof that P ≠ NP? http://aeporreca.org/2010/08/09/proof-that-p-isnt-np/ Wannabe computer scientist Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:46:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Deolalikar’s manuscript « Constraints http://aeporreca.org/2010/08/09/proof-that-p-isnt-np/#comment-23 Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:54:05 +0000 http://aeporreca.org/?p=544#comment-23 [...] 20100810: see Deolalikar’s updated paper, the clearinghouse wiki, Antonio E. Porreca’s meta-summary, and Richard Lipton’s update. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)No [...]

]]> By: P≠NP. at webCONSUL http://aeporreca.org/2010/08/09/proof-that-p-isnt-np/#comment-22 Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:14:31 +0000 http://aeporreca.org/?p=544#comment-22 [...] Antonio E. Porreca [...]

]]> By: How to get everyone talking about your research! http://aeporreca.org/2010/08/09/proof-that-p-isnt-np/#comment-19 Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:39:12 +0000 http://aeporreca.org/?p=544#comment-19 [...] Porreca has the best write-up on reactions to this [...]

]]> By: Tweets that mention A relatively serious proof that P ≠ NP? « Antonio E. Porreca -- Topsy.com http://aeporreca.org/2010/08/09/proof-that-p-isnt-np/#comment-18 Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:59:28 +0000 http://aeporreca.org/?p=544#comment-18 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tony Finch, Antonio E. Porreca. Antonio E. Porreca said: Obligatory P ≠ NP post, with a summary of the comments by TCS people. (Please, help me keeping it up-to-date.) http://wp.me/pVkQE-8M [...]

]]>